Breaking

CI-133: What It Is—and What It Is Not on Montana’s 2026 Ballot

What CI-133 would change about Montana's initiative and referendum protections, and what a Yes or No vote means.

Listen to this article

Hear this story read aloud using your phone or computer's built-in voice. No recording or login needed.

Ready. Press Play to listen.

Montana voters already possess constitutional initiative and referendum powers. CI-133 proposes additional constitutional protections for those powers and the procedures used to exercise them.

What current law provides

Montana Constitution Article III establishes initiative and referendum rights, while Article XIV concerns constitutional amendments. State laws regulate the review and circulation of petitions, verification of signatures, and qualification of ballot measures.

What CI-133 would change

The proposal would describe initiative and referendum as fundamental rights and create further requirements for fair and timely review, petitions, signature gathering and challenges. Its detailed language—not a slogan—determines the specific legal effect.

What it would not do

It would not automatically qualify every proposed initiative or remove all signature and procedural requirements. The public would still decide whether to accept qualified initiatives at the ballot box.

What Yes and No mean

A Yes vote would add the proposed protections to the state Constitution. A No vote would leave the existing constitutional framework in place. Voters should compare the full amendment with the existing constitutional provisions.

Sources and further reading

Montana Secretary of State: 2026 Voter Information Pamphlet; Official measure status and text; Published measure text.

By Steven Bullcoming Haworth · © 2026 Steven Bullcoming Haworth & Corry Bullcoming. All rights reserved.

Share this story
FacebookEmail
#TruthInFocus #Montana #Ballot #EasternMontana